Read time: 3 minutes
Construction doesn’t bill like other industries.
Work may be completed over months or years. Billing follows project progress rather than a traditional point of sale. Payment applications build on previous billing periods. Retainage may hold back a portion of earned revenue. Change orders can alter contract value. Stored materials may need to be accounted for before they’re installed.
For the software platforms serving contractors, those aren’t minor industry details. They’re part of the workflows customers expect their technology to understand.
And they have an important implication for embedded payments: a construction payment experience can’t be designed separately from the construction workflow around it.
In construction, getting paid starts long before the payment
A typical commercial construction billing cycle involves much more than generating an invoice.
Progress billing often starts with a schedule of values (SOV) that breaks the contract into billable components. As work progresses, contractors submit pay applications reflecting work completed during the billing period, prior billings, stored materials, and the amount currently due.
Depending on the project, that process may also involve AIA-style G702/G703 documentation, percent complete, retainage, approved change orders, lien waivers and multiple layers of review and approval. Current construction software products increasingly bring these elements together as one connected billing workflow.
That’s why a generic invoice-to-payment experience only tells part of the story.
The software platform has to understand what happened before a customer is ready to pay—and what needs to happen afterward to keep the project and financial records aligned.
Retainage and progress billing change the payment experience
Take retainage.
A portion of payment may be withheld until contractual conditions are met or the project reaches a later stage. That means the amount earned, the amount billed and the amount actually paid aren’t necessarily the same.
Progress billing creates another layer. Each new pay application may depend on the original contract value, the schedule of values, prior applications, work completed during the current period, stored materials, retainage and approved changes.
For a construction software company, those mechanics matter because customers don’t experience “billing,” “payments,” “project management” and “accounting” as completely separate worlds.
They’re parts of the same project lifecycle.
The opportunity for construction software platforms is bigger than payment acceptance
This is where embedded payments can become strategically interesting for an ISV.
The goal isn’t simply to give contractors another way to accept a card or ACH payment.
It’s to make the payment experience feel like a natural continuation of the project and billing workflows the platform already manages.
For the software provider, that can create value in several ways.
A stronger product experience. Customers can complete more of the project-to-cash workflow without leaving the software.
Greater platform relevance. Connecting project activity, billing, and payments can make the platform more central to the financial side of the job.
Product differentiation. Construction software that understands how the industry actually bills can deliver a more relevant experience than a generic payment capability bolted onto the product.
A path to platform growth. When payments happen within the software, the ISV has an opportunity to participate in payment activity that may otherwise happen through disconnected providers. For example, Concrete Pumping Holdings, the nation’s largest concrete pumping company, offers a look at what that depth of participation can mean. Centralizing payment activity across nearly 95 branches in 23 states, with data flowing nightly into their accounting system for reconciliation, solved exactly the kind of visibility and workflow challenges an ISV’s own customers deal with every day.
The construction workflow becomes the context. The stronger software platform is the outcome.
Don’t force construction workflows into a generic payments model
This is where the payments partner matters.
Construction software companies shouldn’t have to simplify the way their customers work simply because a payment provider was designed around a conventional checkout experience.
A better approach starts with questions such as:
- How does the platform already handle progress billing?
- Where do pay applications and approvals happen?
- How are invoices, project records, and incoming payments connected?
- What role do retainage and change orders play in the customer experience?
- Where can payments be introduced without creating another disconnected process?
Those are software-platform questions as much as payments questions.
And they require a partner that understands the vertical—not just the transaction.
Build around the way construction gets paid
Construction software earns its place in the market by understanding the complexity that generic business software doesn’t.
Payments should follow the same principle.
When payment capabilities are designed around project-based billing and connected to the workflows contractors already use, the software platform can provide a more complete experience while strengthening its own value proposition.
The goal isn’t to turn a construction ISV into a payments company.
It’s to help the platform do more for the construction businesses that already depend on it.
For a deeper look at how software platforms can approach embedded payments, explore our Embedded Payments That Strengthen Your Platform guide, including how to evaluate ownership models, adoption strategy, platform value, and the role of a strategic payments partner.
Ready to get started? Contact us, and we’ll walk you through the next steps.
